I don't want to raise my kids in a society with ambiguous definitions of family.
1. If your kids are heterosexual, they will stay this way, don't worry about this. If your kid(s) is homosexual, you won't change that even if same-sexual marriage will be banned.
2. Why would a definition "union between two human beings" be too ambiguous?
So how far would your union of 2 human beings go? 2 men? 2 women? A man and a 6-year-old girl? Can we re-classify apes as human beings? Will the liberals allow Bush to stay married because they don't think he is a human being.
Btw, I don't view homosexuality as a disease. I have had many gay friends and I never had any problems with them. I just don't like the idea of taking one of the oldest and most sacred traditions and twisting it into something else.
I really don't understand why the gay marriage is viewed as a proverbial "slippery slope." Where does it say that gay marriage must necessarily lead to legalization of child molestation or beastiality? Neither children, nor animals are viewed as marriageable on principle because they are NOT COMPETENT HUMAN ADULTS. I fail to see how allowing gays to marry would endanger 6-year-old girls. I think it's a monster-in-the-closet argument. And as for "will the liberals allow Bush to stay married because they don't think he is a human being"--ha. ha. ha. Funny.
The Herculean task would be so much more pleasant if I'd known that the shift was left by your bursting from self-importance. Ma gavte la nata, Mounsieur Tima, Ma gavte la nata. Go measure your small dick again, if it's grown - it's all that shit...
"Two adult human beings" -- how does that sound? The 6-year old girl cannot marry, due to quite a simple fact that she, just like the ape, does not realize the repercussions of her actions.
Bush, by far, is a human being, even though in his mental capacity he does sometimes remind me of a 6-year old girl, but that's beyond the point. I appreciate your wit.
"Most sacred traditions"... Could you come down from the tribune and look around? Traditions must accept change. Fifty years ago interracial marriage, for example, was preposterous - would you identify it as a twist of tradition as well?
Bottom line: I do not understand why two adult people who love each other and want to share the rest of their lives together should not be able to marry each other.
tired to explain - when the two people are the same sex it's not a marriage. It's a union of some kind. Marriage is completely different thing no matter what the Supreme Jugdes say or whoever if you will. For me - it's different, that's all. And I explained many times - I don't want to be in the same compartment for that matter with the same-sex people. I am not against them, I am not against their unions, but it's not marriage.
Speaking of trhditions - I don't think a marriage is a tradition, we arguing about a term. That's all.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-15 03:18 pm (UTC)1. If your kids are heterosexual, they will stay this way, don't worry about this. If your kid(s) is homosexual, you won't change that even if same-sexual marriage will be banned.
2. Why would a definition "union between two human beings" be too ambiguous?
Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-15 11:52 pm (UTC)Btw, I don't view homosexuality as a disease. I have had many gay friends and I never had any problems with them. I just don't like the idea of taking one of the oldest and most sacred traditions and twisting it into something else.
Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-16 05:23 am (UTC)Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-16 05:31 am (UTC)Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-16 09:30 am (UTC)AFAIK, gay men and women always could and still can marry everywhere in the US as long as they marry people of the opposite sex.
Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-16 12:14 pm (UTC)Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-16 03:15 pm (UTC)You sir, are full of shit.
Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-16 05:37 pm (UTC)Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-17 10:46 am (UTC)that the shift was left by your bursting from self-importance.
Ma gavte la nata, Mounsieur Tima, Ma gavte la nata. Go measure your small dick again, if it's grown - it's all that shit...
Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-17 06:14 pm (UTC)Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-19 12:04 am (UTC)Re: частично из-за этого
Date: 2004-07-19 12:10 am (UTC)"Two adult human beings" -- how does that sound? The 6-year old girl cannot marry, due to quite a simple fact that she, just like the ape, does not realize the repercussions of her actions.
Bush, by far, is a human being, even though in his mental capacity he does sometimes remind me of a 6-year old girl, but that's beyond the point. I appreciate your wit.
"Most sacred traditions"... Could you come down from the tribune and look around? Traditions must accept change. Fifty years ago interracial marriage, for example, was preposterous - would you identify it as a twist of tradition as well?
Bottom line: I do not understand why two adult people who love each other and want to share the rest of their lives together should not be able to marry each other.
bottom line:
Date: 2004-07-19 04:44 am (UTC)Speaking of trhditions - I don't think a marriage is a tradition, we arguing about a term. That's all.